Designing food sovereignty as a set of policies that promote changes in the current development model.
To address food sovereignty in an individual, family, neighborhood, municipal, national, regional and international levels of perspective.
Food sovereignty is not an end in itself but a new perspective for developing a food policy debate withnot -sensitized players.
Sovereignty should include a territorial and ethical dimension.
Establish a dialogue between those who advocate the policies of food security and sovereignty as a precondition for defining solutions to the food problem.
Food sovereignty means redefining the nature (Pachamama) as a matter of right, just like people.
In the African context the challenge is to preserve family farming and family, which is why we talk about agricultural sovereignty.
Promote food sovereignty implies knowing how to identify the opportunities that can lead to dialogue between different actors (including the opposite) for the benefit of citizenship (case of fishing after the tsunami in Chile).
Definefood sovereigntypoliciestakingintoaccountthedietary patternsand not justtheproduction models.
The food trainingshould be directednotonlystudentsbutalso includeparentsandteachers.
Howto integratedifferent levelsof governancetobe includedinthe definitionofagricultural and food policy?
Theconsumermustknowand understand not onlythe nutritional aspectsoffoodbutalsothe territorial and social aspects,etc.
Notto considertheaccessto natural resources isolated.It isalso necessary toaddressthesocialmanagementof it.
Some challenges facing the food sovereignty for its future development: integrated access and management of natural resources, address the food chains in a multi-stakeholder perspective, integrating the World Trade Organization, catering, etc.